It all began on May 30, 11:15 am, on the blog of François Mitterrand in 2007: "Hey, ask Mr. Apathy what he has seen in the toilets of the Regional Council of Haute-Normandie one evening in March 1992… You will hear a story good flash on the true nature of Fabius. promised And if Apathy does not tell you, I promise to deliver the word end of history. " May 31, 17.10, blog François Mitterrand in 2007: "Will there someone to tell me whether Mr. Apathy revealed what he had seen in March 1992 in the toilets of the Regional Council of Haute-Normandie after Antoine election to the presidency Ruffenacht the region against Fabius. " June 1, 16.50, blog François Mitterrand in 2007: "And rather than wonder about trivial things well, just ask Mr. Aphatie what he saw, fifteen years ago, in the toilets of the Regional Council Upper Normandy. It was hot gorges in Paris at the time, to the point that the case back to me, although it did not submit scandalous nature, I hasten to say this for many journalists I read here every day. " June 2, the first reaction of Jean-Michel Aphatie under the title "Response to the forces of the spirit": "In recent days, the owner of a blog dedicated to think and write as would, according to him, François Mitterrand quote me as a witness to a scene that I surprise, years ago, the Regional Council of Haute-Normandie and addressing Laurent Fabius. (...) First, the facts. ago fifteen years, in March 1992, local elections were renewed regional parliaments. while I was working in the service of political Parisien and I was following the news th left. At the time, Laurent Fabius was first secretary of the Socialist Party. He was a candidate in those elections and regional devat convoiter, for himself or for his fièle second in the region, Alain Le Vern, the Chair of the Regional Council of Haute-Normandie. J'emploi the conditional because I remember vaguely distant of these cases. It seems to me, but my memory is not precise on this subject, that I actually covered the election of the President of the Regional Council in the year 1992. But none of marking not stuck in the lead. Some journalists remain and accumulate notes and documentation. Personally, I have never done this. I throw everything as I do m'encombre nothing, neither notebooks blackened notes insignificant or clippings from these events that make perishable news. All entries which I have worked documentation services much better organized than I had ever will be, and much richer in documents of any kind that no other journalist will not be building these cases where cram articles cut at the whim of readings. Everyone lives and works as it wants, but I as far as I am concerned the idea of the traveler without luggage. It is not me who will be able one day to publish a book restoring all the scribbles conversations that I have had, here and there, with major characters who govern us. It is a talent that I did not, and I can not be sad not to have it. All this to say qu'interpellé by François Mtterand junk raging on the web, I could not myself back into memos of the time that had long since disappeared. And when I my mind, I do not see much. Nothing is free in the prose of the one who usurps the identity of the former president. I therefore surprised decisive stage in the toilets of the Regional Council? The image is elegant. Mr. The François Mitterand might suggest more spirit with a journalist is an excavation crap? What I saw, why I do not tell? In questioning to the cantonnade, Mr. Mitterrand ground floor safely insinuates that I found my way to a fine example of this connivance journalists who sees them to keep secrets that might embarrass those who govern us. And how itself would have been aware of my secret? Because I will Gorge is hot? No this journalist, to the point of not telling his readers but to gargle front company for the beautiful shine and the peacock. Things are simple, Mr. --I do not know who you are. I do not remember what I saw. And if it is as important as this, tell him so. I note the complacency with which this blog is presented these days on the canvas. Some even boast to know the identity of its author. I never liked writing anonymous. As often as the opportunity was given to me to do so, I have condemned this dirty habit taken, for example, the publishing world, of books published under a pseudonym. Everything can be said, the worst rumors can be bandied, thanks to the mask behind which often people who have no legitimacy to speak pure. This blog belongs to the breed of inflatable black crows, not brave enough to use it discovered the freedom of speech that we bénificions all, but too embarassés their egos to remain silent. It's a curse the most in this story is to see journalists whom I esteem to mislead in laudatory words about the blog. Speaking discuss s'engueuler their faces, yes. The rest of principle, should be rejected. This is not nothing, a principle. " June 4, blog Jean-Michel Aphatie: "Oh, in fact secret, when is that Mr. Mitterrand overseas income falls we will deliver one he owns about what happened so serious and so enlightening, one day in 1992, in a place that I not mention but which do not always feel good? We expect Mr. Mitterrand. You have said a lot and made salivate all those fascinated by your spirit, expect you revelations, ie the light on all these misdeeds that you seem so well known. read to you, Mr. Mitterrand, I quickly ... " June 5, blog Jean-Michel Aphatie: "Promises, promises… The illusionist who runs a blog under the umbrella of the late François Mitterrand wrote a few days ago: "Hey, ask Mr. Aphatie what he has seen in the toilets of the Regional Council of Haute-Normandie one evening in March 1992… You hear a story illuminating the true nature of Fabius. Promised And if you do Aphatie the recounts not, I promise to deliver the word end of history. " Having already written here that there was nothing in my recollection of a scene apparently so crispy, I expected that this borrowing Mitterrand honors his word. So far, nothing came. There were fun, apparently, to suggest and to put into question. And then, when illuminated, to say what he knows or should know more. We expect Mr. Mitterrand, therefore, that you say what happened so formidable that day and we hope that you will feel bound by the speech that you gave to all those who read you because you are wonderful, spiritual and an opinion, you know, that I do not absolutely. " June 5, 1135, blog François Mitterrand in 2007: "It is my job that I do not yet have any words of the now famous anecdote concerning Laurent Fabius on the evening of his aborted conquest of the Regional Council of Haute-Normandie in 1992. Me On said that the privileged witness of this case no longer remembers anything. Well, that's a shame for a journalist to have such a short memory when it is witnessing a milestone and what it can reveal the psychology of a senior political leader. Moi, I remember many things and my memory serves me that rarely default. Being endowed with a strong memory avoids problems of conscience and storms in when the skulls are evoked old business. None of this is not such a bad thing. is done and all the underpinnings of this story will be delivered soon.… But not today, I will repeat once again: I do what I want, as I want, whenever I want. " June 6, blog Jean-Michel Aphatie: "Meanwhile, the blog François Mitterrand who takes his time. Promised to reveal it if I did not do myself, what happened to decisive and thundering in the French Republic on a certain day of 1992, which involve a former prime minister whom I will not name but who was much younger given to France by a President of the Republic whose pleasure was, among other things, read with the greed Records of phone tapping of his fellow citizens. It appears, for those who still follow and too bad for the other, which I witnessed flee the scene. struck But a gaping sequential memory, I forgot this decisive. Therefore, the blog François Mitterrand who had promised that if I did not cowardice by saying nothing, his brave, would say everything. And then yesterday, it concludes its small prose writing: it whenever I want. Apart from the fact that the sentence was not up to the lofty style generally, the waiting, it became unbearable. How to build validly his citizenship without possess essential that light on the current state of the Republic and give us an insight into those who lead it. Mr. Mitterrand of the Web and the mask together, we reiterate our plea yesterday: talk, tell, tell. Too much is at stake for you taisassiez longer. For France, sir, we ask… " June 7, morning blog Jean-Michel Aphatie: "Those who are tired of reading my blog on the prose of the late Francois Mitterrand can dispense with reading this paragraph since, freely deciding the content of my editorial in this space managed autocratic manner until autumn 2008, and hopefully beyond, these few lines will be re-established. We can see a change of tone in tontonnesque usurper. A few days with an unpleasant rehearsals and derogatory, it tonitruait on revelations that I could do about Laurent Fabius and the truth of his character, while the umbrella of what journalism should, in his opinion, to the necessary information of his fellow citizens. Now, this episode is not mentioned in her notes filled with spirit, humour and information, according to some, and where I still do not see, certainly by jealousy and spite of not possessing the talent of 'usurper, that the swelling of an ego who enjoys the mask which he s'affuble to provide its lessons and its distilled rumours. I therefore reiterate my request. Talk sir, write, we read. You menaciez you intimiez you sure that if I kept silent, you rompriez, n'écoutant your courage. Well, go ahead, go on the pledge to act, the intention to carry it out. It is not because you live hidden need succumb to fear. Your fans await sir. And I with them. Finally, several commentators had fun of the term, I flee witness, rather than I was a witness. Some saw a slip. Maybe they reason, provided by the qualifier. It is in this case a slip digital particular species related to the fact that on a keyboard, the "i" and "u" are close and that, on the other hand, the fingers are large. " June 7, 12:50, blog François Mitterrand in 2007: "I mentioned here a few days ago a story related to the fragility masked by Fabius has always emphasizing that very few people outside their circle of intimate , took the opportunity to be a witness. It is a day of 1992, a journalist now famous and very powerful, had the privilege in circumstances somewhat mundane born chance of life, coincidences of life. Being there when it should not be, a place unusual and see what we did not see, except miracle. This happened when this happened day, there is no need to feed polemics on this, because humanity and dignity of others is not called into question. Anyway view the scene was startling enough for that journalist informs some of his colleagues, who themselves have informed some of my advisers, which themselves have informed me. example circulate the information because it is repeated often enough how journalists are, for public officials that we, precious correspondents on the activities, ambitions, the designs of others. When this case was reported to me, I felt, as my advisor has reported, Fabius very unwise. Can I I am told that this story would be quickly forgotten (except possibly through its direct witness). Thus the lives of journalists, oblivious that the news of the day is the history of tomorrow, talkative contemplate the sea foam, dumb insensitive to the movement of tides. I realize that I am already too long and that it is not yet so far as I could reveal all the secrets of this story. I am sorry and not see malice on my part. I stand here at the moment, and over the journalist holds a big secret hidden in the thickets of his memory capricious, in my respectful consideration with respect to their person and its function, both absolutely necessary for our Republic in these difficult times. " On June 7 in the day, Jean-Michel Aphatie devotes an entire ticket to the case, under the heading "Response François Mitterrand-2007" to comment on the ticket written by the blogger 12:50 mystery: "It is strange. There are, in the hollow of the lines, as a proposal for armistice. formulation But even keeps a part of pride that makes the proposal, if it exists, unacceptable. On the one hand, it was stated that the public figure in question was "very unwise". It would therefore have delivered something itself that is important. After both said, Mitterrand-2007 has everything. It should especially since it seeks to justify his own silence by this supposed lightness "of journalists, oblivious that the news of the day is the history of tomorrow, talkative contemplate the sea foam, insensitive to the silent Tidal movements. " How to find itself in this portrait of the inconsistency? Not more than another, a journalist forgets, disposing of his memory what the brand, it seems important, significant. A journalist is not necessarily, not every time, the epitome of foolishness. I said that I had forgotten one scene apparently important because this scene, if I saw it, I do remember. If Mr. Mitterrand-2007 in which I did not ask, know, who threatened to reveal if I did not do myself, he says. Maybe does it not because her story has no interest and that he is as vantards these characters, trapped in their delusions childish and not knowing how to untangle themselves irrelevant to their promises. Indeed, a remark is from reading the note du jour. The journalist in question, it is said, told the scene with other journalists who themselves have told advisers to the president who themselves have told the president. This story is a bit that of the man who saw the man who saw the man who saw the monkey which began chimpazé who saw the bear and who will tell the bear as if he saw himself. In short, it's heavy and serious. However, the requirement remains. Since Mr. 2007 Mitterrand me intermingled with its fabrications with the clear will of m'embarrasser, thus ensuring that this ridiculous scene itself having the courage to tell what he knows. Or, is an honorable exit door, he recognized its wrong to have done so and I do speak more. " June 8, blog Jean-Michel Aphatie (forgetting that he had already written the day before he pluis speak of the case): "As you will have noted, there is much talk here of François Mitterrand. Ahead . The Mitterrand-2007, which maintains a blog is a species which usually begins his day at late hours. The sarkozyste France, which gets up early as we all know, much has already transpired appears when the post of the masked man, unless it is a woman, moreover, but also hidden, which does not change the case. Two assumptions this morning. Or it Mitterrand-2007 finally tells his story which I subodore that apart from a gogo, nobody would buy very expensive on the market manipulations and revelations of all kinds of politics. Or, do not, it is appropriate that such insinuations were displaced unfounded, and regrets. Or, perhaps most likely, he takes refuge behind these sentences to double and triple knots drawers to try and win a little time, unglamorous way to manage the embarrassment that he began his even referring to a story in three sub s'et he promised to tell if I could not find the courage to do it myself. So wait prose of the day. We shall see if Mitterrand-2007 holds its promises or not. "
